MSRMC, Bangalore: Feedback on vision-2015

IAFM's-first rough draft-Comments on VISION-2015

Rough Draft VISION-2015 IAFM Memo

Letter (10th Jan) by Dr.Adarsh

Dear All,
Thanks for your valuable comments. In the meantime, one request to provide the annexure as mentioned, with citing the reasons, has been sent to MCI. I am attaching herewith the copy of letter sent to MCI for your kind perusal. I request all of you to press for the same, which will give the opportunity to express views by all specialties, as well as the time, so that RTI can be used in an effective manner; buying time is of essence, only by which  this document will come to the knowledge of everyone. Still maximum number of faculties of concerned subjects  are unaware about this document and that seems to be the hidden agenda of MCI.

Please circulate it to all concerned faculties, surgery, gynae, patho, micro, etc., as they are also equally uncomfortable with this document; only we have to make them aware. 
The letter, sent to MCI, is available in the later part of this article.

Dr.A.K.Srivastava's letter to IAFM

Dear Dr. Adarsh Kumar

Comments by Dr.J.V.Dixit

God, save this country from BOG!

A Pathologist's view

Dear Forensic Faculty,
I will have to agree 'in principle' regarding the comments expressed by all of you; the vision 2015 seems to be biased, inconvenient, illogical and unwarranted; i add to your views that such proposals are fit to be disposed off into the archives, without implementation.

Comments by Dr.Akash Deep Aggarwal

please visit the two links below to understand the concept of doctors available in india as per GoI data and how it nullifies the basis of the vision-2015

In reply to Dr.Shaikh Khaja's Comments

My views to Prof.Shaikh Khaja's letter to MCI (available in this blog).

Comments by Prof. Rema Jagadish

This is to express my apprehension in sidelining Forensic Medicine, in the proposed new curriculum.

Comments by Dr.Zachariah Thomas

The undergraduate education working group has proposed to emasculate and there by going to administer

Strategies towards resisting proposed UG Med. Educ.

Excerpts from another blog


Who's idea is it?

The idea of pushing FMT to stonage has originated from .....................

Excerpts of Dr Adarsh's letter

........We have to act very fast and put everything into action in a methodical manner..........While commenting try to be precise and penetrative.............. subject in 2nd or in final year? .........also please comment upon the weightage to be given to toxicology.............distribution of teaching hours need be clarified considering other disciplines ................

Dr.S.C.Mestri's comments


I request the Forensic medicine & toxicology associations to add to my views and send a draft to MCI on or before 15-01-2011 lest we may have to fight again against their irrational, impractical decision likely to arrive in 2011. The need of hour is swift, stubborn and robust resistance.

Comments by Dr.R


Dr.Arun's comments

.......One can hardly do justice (both students as well as teachers) with the reduced frame of time. There is no representation from 2nd year subject experts in the working group. The subjects of Pathology, pharmacology, forensic medicine and microbiology, do serve as strong base for the better comprehension of clinical subjects and hence assigning 1 and a half year to these subjects shall not be considered as a wastage of time......
The medical faculty also reserves its right to know the basis for grouping the medical subjects as A, B and C. 

Dr.Nagesh's comments


It is not clear whether they want to keep Forensic faculty in UG teaching? If forensic subject is taught by other specialties like OBG, Surgery, etc., what is work for Forensic Specialist? Where is the question of employing a Forensic Specialist in Medical Colleges (especially private medical colleges)? Are they meant for only conducting medicolegal autopsies? If so, how many private medical colleges are conducting medicolegal autopsies?